To be honest, I’ve been thinking of reverting this article to revision 132103 for a while. Admitted, the helpfulness rate did go up a bit around the time of approval by Matt (July/August 2017), but it stands out compared to all other Sumo articles with regard to style, type of writing, and more. No other article uses "a), b)" etc, no markup for any menu items was used, there is no such thing as a "Profile app" or "Profile app window", there is no reference to what a profile is (except for the bottom paragraph), and I think it’s still too technical for regular users. For this reason I have not updated it to meet the en-US version for my locale around that time, so there is a mismatch.
@kenptr: would you be willing to rewrite your changes to match the common style, taking terminology and all you can find in the Writing guide for Knowledge Base articles article and beyond into account?
To be honest, I’ve been thinking of reverting this article to revision 132103 for a while. Admitted, the helpfulness rate did go up a bit around the time of approval by Matt (July/August 2017), but it stands out compared to all other Sumo articles with regard to style, type of writing, and more. No other article uses "a), b)" etc, no markup for any menu items was used, there is no such thing as a "Profile app" or "Profile app window", there is no reference to what a profile is (except for the bottom paragraph), and I think it’s still too technical for regular users. For this reason I have not updated it to meet the en-US version for my locale around that time, so there is a mismatch.
@kenptr: would you be willing to rewrite your changes to match the common style, taking terminology and all you can find in the [[Write articles for the Knowledge Base]] article and beyond into account?